Jack Born On Marketing, Online Business, and PHP Code

I’ve been hooked into watching the latest foray of Simon Cowell into “train wreck tv”. For me, American Inventor has proven impossible to not watch… even though I know that what I’m seeing is a polished and packaged product that has been well thought out and designed to appeal to some of the darkest desires of human nature.

The show is about two thirds Schadenfreude and one third inspirational, with some interesting gems of wisdom sprinkled in.

The Schadenfreude component is the expected parade of dreamers that have traded every possession, most of their relationships, and virtually all of their money for some crazy pseudo-invention that is un-marketable, outlandish, or just plain lame.

The show is created to appeal to the same knee-jerk instinct that makes traffic backup on the highway whenever there’s a horrific wreck and people strain their necks to see an image of another human being’s misfortune. It’s the Jerry Springer appeal: “look Martha… that person is really bad off. Maybe my life isn’t quite that bad.”

End of my speech on the dark side of human nature…

Here are some instructive lessons from the show.

Lesson #1 - Don’t fall in love with your product

Creative types (and I fall into this category) have a natural tendency to fall madly in love with their concept or product. This obsession can quickly consume the creator/dreamer and blind them to the realities of the marketplace.

Logic goes out the window and they refuse to let anything into their thought process that interferes with their dream.

For example, one poor woman makes her presentation for her “bed buddy” (I don’t remember the name exactly, but I’m close). One of the judges informs her that the product already exists and that his wife has one at home.

Her reaction… “He must be an idiot because I didn’t take my product to market so his wife can’t possibly own one already.”

Lesson #2 - Be careful who you give your money to in pursuit of your dream

The same woman I just mentioned got swindled for $12,000 by one of those invention companies you see advertising all the time on TV. The swindle works like this: every idea ever presented to them is the most brilliant thing they have ever heard, they are certain that you’re going to be the next Edison, and all it takes is $10,000 to get you a patent (or apply for one) and get a useless book about your idea printed up.

Scumbags.

Lesson #3 - Test the marketplace first
Spend $10,000 marketing or beta testing your product in the marketplace before you sink $100,000 or $200,000 into the development of your widget.

I am really amazed at the number of middle-class ordinary Joe’s on the show that plead with the judges to consider the fact that they have “invested” 20+ years of their life, all of their savings, and thousands of dollars from friends and families into a dream with no happy ending.

I’m not exaggerating about the 20+ years and $100,000+ capital outlays. And what do they have to show for it? A rinky dink prototype?

Some of these gizmos would be perfect to demo at a “Home Show” in their local convention center. $1,500 for a booth and in two days you know if you have a winner or a loser.
Lesson #4 - Consider the economics

Following from lesson #3 above, what are you thinking when you invest $100,000 into a project where each sale is going to gross $19 or $29? What are you expecting to put in the bank (after Simon Cowell gets his cut)?

The most expensive part of business is the client acquisition. You’ve gone and invested $100,000 in product development (for a simple widget) and now you have no money to attract clients, and more importantly, you have nothing to sell these clients once they become clients.

Silly.

Lesson #5 - It has to go down the drain
I love the fact that the judges get really excited about consumables. Rightfully so.

Gillette is built on the fact that razors must be replaced. Pur water filters… same deal. Anything where you get a client for life instead of the one hit.

This concept is my focus for 2006 and is being built into virutally every business I launch this year. My products and services don’t go down the drain like vitamins do (GNC) but they are designed to generate ongoing monthly revenue.

If you don’t have a backup (backend) product line to sell once you consumate the first transaction with a new client, then a product or service geared towards consumption and renewal is the perfect alternative. Plus, it gives you the ability to make unbelievable first-time offers. Give away the razor, sell them the razor blade refills for life.

As a final thought on this before I beat it to death…

Have you notice that virtually every household product has recently been reinvented so that some part of it gets tossed in the trash upon completion? The Swisher mop is practically given away (or sold at a new loss) so that you’re hooked on buying the refills forever. Clorox just came out with wipes that you pull out of the plastic jar like hand wipes and use to clean up around the house. Toss it in the trash and buy more.

From a marketing perspective these companies (Proctor and Gamble especially) are selling convenience but what they’re really pushing is built in repeat transactions - continuity income.

Conclusion - It’s all about the Benjamins

You can tell that none of these folks have put any serious thought into the market to which they will be selling their gizmos.

• How large is the market? (some have researched at least this far)
• What do they already buy?
• Do they have money to spend and a propensity to buy lots of things?
• Are they passionate?
• Will they be repeat buyers?
• Will they spread the word about a “wonder product”? Do they talk to each other?
• Are they reachable? Can you buy a list of them and send them direct mail? Can they be readily found in certain corners of the web?
• Is there anyone in the marketplace that would joint venture with you to bring this product to life?
• What media does the market consume and is it possible to generate publicity for the product launch?

It’s kind of sad to watch these hopeful dreamers pitch to four judges. It seems like every single one of them was struck with an idea for some new product and decided to move forward with the concept without considering the marektplace at all. The inventors that have a possible hit on their hands just happened to get hit with an idea that might have an appeal to a market… but the process they used to arrive at their product idea was really no different than the process used by the losers.

Each contestant is looking for approval from a panel of judges when they could have gotten real feedback from a real market and either be on their way to building wealth or abandoning the project and moving on.

These people don’t have product problems, they have marketing problems. Some of which can’t be solved by a blessing from a panel of judges… no matter how qualified they are.

And you know that if this show is anything like American Idol, each entrant had to sign their future away to Simon Cowell for a shot at winning the contest.